Comments on: Experts question theory on global warming http://rightwingcafe.com/2007/02/13/experts-question-theory-on-global-warming/ "Back-handing the Left into Submission" Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:59:56 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: drew phillips http://rightwingcafe.com/2007/02/13/experts-question-theory-on-global-warming/#comment-1746 Tue, 27 Feb 2007 02:16:30 +0000 http://rightwingcafe.com/2007/02/13/experts-question-theory-on-global-warming/#comment-1746 2000 scientists publish reports (some that are based on 20 years of research) that are peer-reviewed and then reviewed again by more than 100 governments and these are the people you call alarmists!? please point out any peer-reviewed RESEARCH that states that pollution does not effect the envrironment or the weather. <em>RWC - You don't cite any of these reports but everyone is supposed to suck up whatever any Global Warner says. If you want research I don't have the time to track it down for you. Be proactive and look for as much proof or reports that contradict your beliefs. It is the intelligent thing to do, the sun and natural effects have more to do with the atmosphere than what we do. Don't be naive. I can cite as many "scientists" as yourself, some are already cited on this blog such as the article you posted to. You sure ignored his opinion. What kind of scientist, what level of knowledge they posses, etc. is the determining factor.</em> 2000 scientists publish reports (some that are based on 20 years of research) that are peer-reviewed and then reviewed again by more than 100 governments and these are the people you call alarmists!? please point out any peer-reviewed RESEARCH that states that pollution does not effect the envrironment or the weather.

RWC - You don’t cite any of these reports but everyone is supposed to suck up whatever any Global Warner says. If you want research I don’t have the time to track it down for you. Be proactive and look for as much proof or reports that contradict your beliefs. It is the intelligent thing to do, the sun and natural effects have more to do with the atmosphere than what we do. Don’t be naive. I can cite as many “scientists” as yourself, some are already cited on this blog such as the article you posted to. You sure ignored his opinion. What kind of scientist, what level of knowledge they posses, etc. is the determining factor.

]]> by: M. Smith http://rightwingcafe.com/2007/02/13/experts-question-theory-on-global-warming/#comment-1638 Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:23:27 +0000 http://rightwingcafe.com/2007/02/13/experts-question-theory-on-global-warming/#comment-1638 damn, does this mean i have to throw away all these bags of ice cubes I have been saving for the last 10 years? damn, does this mean i have to throw away all these bags of ice cubes I have been saving for the last 10 years?

]]> by: what's up http://rightwingcafe.com/2007/02/13/experts-question-theory-on-global-warming/#comment-1624 Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:33:12 +0000 http://rightwingcafe.com/2007/02/13/experts-question-theory-on-global-warming/#comment-1624 Woa!, Stop the bus; don't you know that logic and science are cast aside when it comes to such a critical issue as Global Warming, where theary, speculation and lies are treated as truth and fact. Woa!, Stop the bus; don’t you know that logic and science are cast aside when it comes to such a critical issue as Global Warming, where theary, speculation and lies are treated as truth and fact.

]]>